After a decade of deep engagement in the IMU field, my biggest takeaway is that the industry’s focus has quietly shifted—once, the competition centered on the limits of hardware specifications; now, algorithm iteration is the key to widening the gap. Five years ago, achieving high-precision motion tracking almost exclusively relied on expensive fiber optic IMUs, as the drift and noise issues of ordinary MEMS devices were simply unable to meet the demands of rigorous scenarios. But today, software technology is subverting this inherent perception, enabling low-cost hardware to deliver performance beyond its class.
What stands out most is a drone inspection project I participated in last year. Due to budget constraints, the client could only use entry-level MEMS IMUs. During initial testing, the drone suffered from poor hovering stability and severe heading drift, making it impossible to complete precise inspection tasks. Instead of rushing to replace the hardware, the team optimized the attitude solution algorithm specifically, introduced adaptive Kalman filtering, and added noise suppression logic based on environmental vibration models. After two weeks of debugging, the drone’s positioning accuracy improved by nearly 60%, the drift problem was effectively controlled, and it fully met the client’s needs.
This is not to say that hardware is unimportant, but rather that algorithms fully unlock the potential of hardware. Different scenarios have vastly different algorithm requirements. For example, IMUs in consumer VR devices need fast-response and low-latency algorithms, even if a small amount of precision is sacrificed to ensure user experience; industrial positioning devices, on the other hand, prioritize algorithm stability and anti-interference capabilities, requiring accurate filtering of invalid data in complex environments. Many teams fall into the trap of blindly applying general-purpose algorithms, ultimately leading to poor device performance.
The development of IMU algorithms today also faces challenges in data annotation and scenario adaptation. Advanced algorithms mostly rely on large amounts of real-scenario data for training, but scenarios vary greatly across industries. For instance, IMUs in medical rehabilitation equipment need to capture subtle human motion data, while automotive IMUs must cope with complex working conditions such as vibrations and electromagnetic interference, making it difficult to form a unified training dataset. This is why many algorithms that perform excellently in laboratories fail to adapt when deployed in real-world scenarios.
We once optimized the IMU algorithm for a senior rehabilitation bracelet. Initially, we directly adopted the algorithm model of sports bracelets, but it failed to accurately identify slow-motion rehabilitation exercises and frequently triggered false alarms. Later, we collected hundreds of sets of rehabilitation motion data from elderly users, adjusted the algorithm’s threshold parameters and feature extraction logic, and added a motion rhythm recognition module, which finally solved the problem. This process made me realize that there is no one-size-fits-all template for IMU algorithms—scenario-specific customization is the key.
With the deep integration of AI technology and IMUs, the importance of algorithms will continue to grow. In the future, we may no longer need to stack high-end hardware for precision; instead, we can use algorithms to adapt to different scenarios and calibrate errors independently, enabling IMUs to achieve a new model of "universal hardware, customized algorithms". However, this also places higher requirements on engineers—they must not only understand hardware principles but also possess algorithm optimization and scenario insight capabilities. The combination of both is the core competence most needed in the industry today.
It is worth mentioning that edge computing technology is also driving the upgrading of IMU algorithms. In the past, many complex algorithms relied on cloud computing power, resulting in latency issues. Edge computing allows IMUs to complete data processing and algorithm operations directly on the device, significantly reducing latency—a crucial breakthrough for scenarios with high real-time requirements such as autonomous driving and industrial robots. However, this brings the challenge of algorithm lightweighting: how to retain core functions with limited device computing power has become a new industry topic.
In summary, the IMU field has entered a new era from "hardware-dominated" to "algorithm-empowered". It is no longer a hardware component that merely competes on parameters, but a system-level solution with deep integration of software and hardware. Teams that can gain a foothold in this field in the future must not only understand the underlying logic of hardware but also solve scenario pain points through algorithms. This software-hardware collaboration mindset is precisely the core capability most needed in the current industry.
Your message must be between 20-3,000 characters!
